Home Military Aviation F-35 “A-10 will always be better than F-35 in Close Air Support. In all the other missions the JSF wins” F-35 pilot says Here’s why the MiG-29 could defeat the
The MiG-35 is a highly manoeuvrable air superiority fighter, which was shown for the first time in August 2005 during the MAKS Air Show outside Moscow. The fighter is powered by RD-33 OVT thrust vectoring control engines. The RD-33 OVT engines provide superior manoeuvrability and enhance the fighter’s performance in close air-to-air engagements.
The MiG-29 silhouette on the F-16AM J-063. (Screenshot from the Dutch MOD video) We have obtained a photo of one of the two Su-30 Flankers intercepted by the Italian F-35 jets over the Baltic
The MIG-35 has super-maneuverability, the ability to fly at supercritical angles of attack at higher levels of sustained and available g-loads and high turn-angle rates, which calls for a higher thrust-to-weight ratio and superior wing aerodynamic efficiency. F-35 The F-35 is actually highly maneuverable, unlike what the media claims.
The F-35 was designed to replace the F-16 (and F-15) as the world’s most advanced fighter. Be that as it may, the F-16 Fighting Falcon remains competitive in the skies. Therefore, in order to determine which fighter is better (F16 vs F35) we must examine 5 essential differences:
A Ukrainian MiG-29 pilot who goes by the call sign ‘Juice’ has been giving interviews to media outlets about how Ukrainian aircraft and air defense systems have managed to keep the Russians in abeyance for over a month now. The Ukrainian Air Force has managed to do this with MiG-29 and Su-27 fighters. While the […]
Avid Top Gear fans may well remember the time Richard Hammond raced the RAF in a Bugatti Veyron. Well, technology has moved on a little since then, and Paddy
Iran also added a small number of Russian MiG-29 fighters and Su-24 attack jets in the 1990s. 35 F-5s, and 41 F-14s on active duty. Most air forces have long since retired these jets, and
Technically speaking, the F-35 has a lower thrust to weight ratio – 1.07 vs 1.11 of the F-16 – an important statistic in dogfights. Additionally, its close range weaponry is underwhelming compared to the Fighting Falcon. However, the U.S. Air Force believes that the age of the dogfight is over. Battles will be fought with the long-range
It takes about 15 years to design and deploy a new fighter jet, and we don’t have that much time, considering what the Russians and Chinese are doing. However, the F/A-18 costs about $17,000 per hour to fly. The F-35 costs over $42,000 per flight-hour. That difference is significant from an operations budget standpoint.
Most modern fighters – F-15, F-16, F-22, F-35, Gripen, Rafale, Su-27/30/35, MiG-29/35 – have huge amounts of body lift in level flight, and many of these (basically all except maybe the F-15) – have large amount of it even when turning. Further, wing area as calculated includes a large percentage of body lifting area as well.
American F-15s today rely on the aging AIM-120C with a 105km range – although the F-15EX could be marketed with the AIM-120D with a longer 180km range. These missiles have less than half the range of the R-37 and are much slower – with a speed of around Mach 4.5. The Su-35 will in the near future also have access to the K-77, which will
MIG-29 vs F-35. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast F-14s vs MiG-28s - May 1986, a Danger Zone in the Indian Ocean.
T7S5tE. 80rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/15580rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/16580rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/20280rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/12980rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/39380rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/34280rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/23180rkdvmkxh.pages.dev/77
mig 29 vs f 35
